NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

Publications

Education & Outreach

• Annual meeting

Meeting information

Abstract Submission

Future Meetings

2007 Columbia

2006 Anchorage

2005 New Orleans

2004 Vancouver

2003 Athens

2002 Pittsburgh

2001 La Crosse

2000 Keystone

Earlier meetings

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Survey Design 2

Session 35 (Special)
Wednesday, June 9, 10:15 AM-12:00 PM, IRC4
Moderator: B. Hughes



10:15  (231) Design and indicator considerations for a probabilistic survey of U.S.A. great rivers: Missouri, Mississippi, Ohio.
B.H. Hill1, D.W. Bolgrien1, T.R. Angradi2, and E.W. Schweiger2. 1U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Duluth, MN, USA 55804, 2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Mid-Continent Ecology Division, Denver, CO, USA 80202

10:30  (232) The applicability of EMAP’s Western Pilot to state and regional questions of fish assemblage structure.
G.A. Lomnicky1, R.M. Hughes1, T.R. Whittier1, and D.V. Peck2. 1Dynamac, Inc. 200 SW 35th St. Corvallis, OR 97333, 2Western Ecology Division, NHEERL, ORD, US Environmental Protection Agency, 200 SW 35th St., Corvallis, OR, 97333

10:45  (233) National stream survey of Sweden 1995 and 2000 – a stratified random sampling of benthic macroinvertebrates.
L Sandin. Department of Environmental Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

11:00  (234) Merging intelligence and probability based approaches in site selection for the Fraser River RCA study design.
T.B. Reynoldson1 and S.A. Sylvestre2. 1Environment Canada, National Water Research Institute at Acadia University, Wolfville, Nova Scotia, 2Environment Canada, Pacific and Yukon Region, Vancouver, British Columbia

11:15  (235) Developing indicators for use in probabilistic survey designs in Great Lakes coastal ecosystems.
C. Richards1, N. Danz2, L.B. Johnson2, T.P. Hollenhorst2, V.J. Brady2, D.H. Brenneman2, J.J.H. Ciborowski3, and T.R. Hrabik4. 1Sea Grant College Program, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA, 55812, 2Natural Resources Research Institute, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA 55811, 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, Windsor, ON, CANADA, N9B 3P4, 4Department of Biology, University of Minnesota Duluth, Duluth, MN, USA, 55812

11:30  (236) Selecting least-disturbed survey sites for Great Plains streams and rivers.
T.R. Whittier1 and J.L. Stoddard2. 1Dynamac, Inc., Corvallis, Oregon, USA 97333, 2U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, USA 97333

11:45  (237) Effect of sampling differing habitat types in regional macroinvertebrate bioassessment surveys.
A.T. Herlihy and W.J. Gerth. Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97339