NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

• Publications

Journal

Bulletin

Membership directory

• NABStracts

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

• 2003

2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1997-2008

Bibliography

NABSLinks

Education & Outreach

Annual meeting

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Presented at the NABS Annual meeting, Athens, Georgia, 2003 in Food Webs

Impacts of predatory fish in grassland and forested streams: does forest cover influence the relative importance of top-down processes?

A.R. McIntosh1, P. Nyström1,2, and M.J. Winterbourn1. 1Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand, 2Department of Ecology, Lund University, Sweden

The influence of predatory fish on stream food webs may be altered by forest cover, and consequent differences in allochthonous inputs and light. Eight sites containing trout (Salmo trutta) and eight sites that did not were sampled. For each predator treatment, half the sites were located in beech (Nothofagus) forest and the rest in grassland. Total invertebrate biomass did not differ between streams with and without trout, but total biomass and taxon richness were significantly higher at grassland sites than forested sites. However, species composition differed between trout and troutless sites, irrespective of forest cover. Trout streams had a low biomass of predatory invertebrates and large shredders, but a high proportion of cased caddisflies. The biomass of coarse organic matter was higher at forested sites, but there was less fine organic matter and more algae at sites with trout, regardless of forest cover. At trout sites, the carbon signals of Deleatidium mayflies, the most abundant invertebrate primary consumer, were closely related to biofilm values, but there was no relationship at troutless sites. These results support a role for both bottom-up and top-down processes in controlling community structure, but indicate that predatory fish and forest cover had largely independent effects.