NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

• Publications

Journal

Bulletin

Membership directory

• NABStracts

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

• 2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1997-2008

Bibliography

NABSLinks

Education & Outreach

Annual meeting

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Presented at the NABS Annual meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2002 in Fish Ecology II

STREAM ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE TO INCREASED LIGHT AND SALMON CARCASS INTRODUCTION.

M.A. Wilzbach1, B.C. Harvey2, K.W. Cummins1, O. Hernandez3, and H. Ambrose1. 1California Cooperative Fish Research Unit, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA 95521USA, 2USFS Redwood Sciences Laboratory, Arcata, CA 95521USA, 3Department of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824 USA

We are conducting a split-plot field experiment to evaluate the relative effects of increased light together with nutrient enhancement from salmon carcasses and riparian litter on salmonid growth and the structure of the food web pathways that support salmonid production. In each of six streams in the Smith and Klamath River basins in northern California, a 20-m wide band of riparian hardwoods was removed along both streambanks of a 100 m reach to increase incident radiation. A second 100 m reach, with an intact canopy, was established in each stream to serve as a light control. In three of the six streams, salmon carcasses, at a density of 1 carcass/2m of stream, were added to both canopy-pruned and light-control sections. Pre-treatment stream reaches were similar in nutrient concentrations, chlorophyll-a, macroinvertebrate functional group composition, and in fish composition. In canopy-removed sections, litter inputs and shredder representation decreased and cumulated PAR increased dramatically, with an attendant increase in primary production. Data are being collected to test the hypothesis that fish growth will be greatest in lighted, nutrient-enhanced reaches, and will decrease in order of lighted reaches without nutrient enhancement, shaded reached with nutrient enhancement, and shaded reaches without nutrient enhancement.