NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

• Publications

Journal

Bulletin

Membership directory

• NABStracts

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

• 2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1997-2008

Bibliography

NABSLinks

Education & Outreach

Annual meeting

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Presented at the NABS Annual meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2002 in Biogeochemistry

STREAM-LAKE ECOTONE INFLUENCE ON THE FORMS AND AMOUNTS OF TRANSPORTED NITROGEN.

M.M. Bozeman and M.A. Baker. Department of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 84322-5305

Ecotones, areas representing interfaces between ecosystems, have high biogeochemical activity and influence the amount and form of nitrogen in watersheds. While the hyporheic zone is a well-understood ecotone in the context of stream ecology, little is known about ecotones between streams and lakes, despite the fact that they are often hydrologically linked. To understand how stream-lake ecotones affect nitrogen amounts and forms, we collected biogeochemical data from two watersheds in the Sawtooth Mountains, Idaho. We hypothesized that deltas, created by streams flowing into lakes, are inorganic nitrogen (DIN) producers and should have the highest DIN content. In contrast, lakes are organic nitrogen (DON) producers, so lake outlets should have lowest DIN and highest DON content. Our results support this hypothesis in that delta nitrate (NO3–N) averaged 22.1±8.2 and was significantly higher (ANOVA p<0.05) than outlet NO3–N (2.2±0.4). However, lake DON (80.4±7.9), not outlet DON (52.3±5.0), was significantly higher (ANOVA p<0.05) than delta DON (43.8±7.3). The DON:DIN ratio traces the dominant N form and may indicate differing process mechanisms. Lake outlets had a DON:DIN ratio of 27, an order of magnitude higher than the ratio (3) of inflowing streams. Future study will address whether observed structural differences indicate different processing mechanisms.