NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

• Publications

Journal

Bulletin

Membership directory

• NABStracts

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

• 2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1997-2008

Bibliography

NABSLinks

Education & Outreach

Annual meeting

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Presented at the NABS Annual meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2002 in Biogeochemistry II

CONTROLS ON NITRATE SPIRALING IN TWO SMALL FORESTED STREAMS DETERMINED BY 15N ADDITION EXPERIMENTS.

P.J. Mulholland1, S.A. Thomas2, C.A. Ancell3, J.J. Beaulieu1, and A.N. Sullivan1. 1Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831-6036, 2Department of Biology, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, 3Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131

To improve our understanding of controls on nitrate uptake in streams, we conducted a series of 15N-nitrate addition experiments in the East and West Forks of Walker Branch, two small, forested streams in eastern Tennessee. Tracer levels of 15N-labelled nitrate were pumped into the stream for 8-12 h and 15N-nitrate was measured in stream water at several locations downstream from the addition. Levels of 15N in all major biomass pools were determined 1 d following the addition to quantify the primary pathways of nitrate uptake. Nitrate uptake length was highly variable over time, reflecting differences in discharge, nitrate concentration, and the demand for nitrogen by stream biota. Nitrate uptake rates per unit area were highest in autumn after leaf-fall and lowest in summer when leaf detritus and primary production were low. Nitrate uptake rates were also relatively high in spring before leaf emergence due to high algal demand, and there was evidence of diurnal variation in nitrate uptake rates at this time of year. Nitrate uptake rates were consistently higher in the East Fork than in the West, and this difference appeared to be the result of uptake within a substantially larger hyporheic zone in the East Fork.