NABS Home | What's new? | Search | Contact

  
  email password   Forgot your login information?

About NABS

Membership application

Taxonomic certification

Classified Ads

Students & Postdocs

• Publications

Journal

Bulletin

Membership directory

• NABStracts

2008

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

• 2002

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

1997-2008

Bibliography

NABSLinks

Education & Outreach

Annual meeting

Journal (J-NABS)

Society Business

Members only

NABSWeb Admin

 
 

Presented at the NABS Annual meeting, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 2002 in Bioassessment: Predictive Models

BIODIVERSITY: A NEW INDEX USING PREDICTIVE MODELS.

S. Linke, R.H. Norris, N.C. Sims, and J.L. Coysh. CRC for Freshwater Ecology, University of Canberra, Belconnen, ACT, 2601 AUSTRALIA

Most existing biodiversity measures do not consider the habitat features at a site, which results in an assessment without a reference and can lead to over- or underestimation of biodiversity. Predictive models, based on habitat features, provide insight into the biological potential of a river. These models use an assessment of the presence of taxa with a high chance of occurrence to indicate the health at a site. A reference for biodiversity may be set by the summing the probabilities of rare taxa. Comparing this sum to the actual number of rare taxa gives a quantitative measure of the conservation value at a site. A site with many more rare taxa than expected may be considered biodiverse. In a trial run in the Sydney water supply catchments, NSW, Australia, using macroinvertebrates, we identified different categories of sites: healthy sites with many rare taxa; healthy sites that are less biodiverse; sites in poor health with few, if any rare taxa and; sites failing the health component that had many more rare taxa than expected. The first and last categories indicate either a change in composition, or the potential for a biodiversity 'hotspots'.